In Salesforce development, two powerful tools are frequently used to automate processes and build custom logic: Salesforce Flows and Apex. Both have distinct strengths and can be incredibly useful in different scenarios, but choosing between them can be a tricky decision for developers and administrators. While Salesforce Flows offer a low-code solution for automation, Apex provides a higher level of control with more complex logic capabilities.

Understanding the complexities around using each, as well as when to use one over the other, is essential for creating efficient, scalable, and maintainable solutions. Let’s dive into the nuances of Salesforce Flows versus Apex, and explore when one is more suitable than the other.


Salesforce Flows: Low Code / High Performance

Salesforce Flows are part of Salesforce’s declarative toolset, allowing users to automate business processes without writing code. With Flows, you can build complex automation logic, perform record updates, send emails, create tasks, and much more—all in a visual interface.

Complexities of Using Salesforce Flows

While Flows are an excellent choice for many use cases, they do come with limitations and complexities that can make them challenging in certain scenarios:

  1. Performance Overhead:
    Flows can become slower when dealing with a large volume of records, especially if there are complex decision trees, loops, or multiple sub-flows. For example, a loop with many records can result in performance degradation, leading to longer execution times.
  2. Complex Logic Limitations:
    Flows are great for linear workflows but can become difficult to manage when logic becomes too intricate. Nested decisions, complex branching, and handling multiple types of records at the same time can be cumbersome in Flow.
  3. Debugging Challenges:
    Troubleshooting and debugging Flow issues can be more difficult compared to Apex. Flows don’t offer the same level of detailed error messages or logging capabilities that Apex provides, making it hard to identify the root cause of failures in complex automations.
  4. Limited Integration Capabilities:
    While Flows can integrate with Salesforce objects, invoking external APIs or services is more challenging. For advanced external system integrations, you may run into restrictions or performance bottlenecks.

Apex: The Power of Code

Apex is Salesforce’s proprietary programming language, providing a robust, full-featured solution for developers who need to write custom logic. Unlike Flows, Apex gives you more control over how your code executes, allowing you to handle complex calculations, integrations, and optimizations.

Complexities of Using Apex

While Apex offers extensive power and flexibility, it comes with its own complexities:

  • Higher Development Time:
    Apex requires coding skills, which means more time spent on development and testing. For simple automations, using Apex may feel overkill compared to a declarative Flow.
  • More Complex Deployment:
    Deploying Apex code involves development, testing, and packaging before it can be moved to production. Unlike Flows, which can be created and activated directly in the UI, Apex requires a more formal deployment process via change sets, or Salesforce DX.
  • Governor Limits:
    While Salesforce’s governor limits are designed to ensure shared resources are used efficiently, they can restrict Apex execution, particularly in cases of bulk data processing or complex logic. Developers must be conscious of limits such as SOQL queries, DML statements, and CPU time to ensure smooth execution.
  • Debugging Complexity:
    Although Apex has better debugging tools than Flows, finding issues in complex, multi-layered code can still be challenging. This often requires deep knowledge of Salesforce’s logging mechanisms and error handling techniques.

When to Use Salesforce Flows

Despite their complexities, Salesforce Flows are often the go-to solution in the following scenarios:

  • Simple to Medium Automation Needs:
    If the process is straightforward, like updating records based on user input or automating email notifications, Flows are an ideal choice. They allow for quick configuration and implementation.
  • Non-Technical Users or Admins:
    Flows are designed with admin-friendly interfaces, so if you want a solution that doesn’t require a developer to implement, Flows are your best bet. Admins can build and maintain flows with little to no code, which accelerates deployment and reduces the need for custom development.
  • Visual, User-Driven Processes:
    If you need a wizard-like flow that guides users through complex data entry processes, Salesforce Flows excel. You can create easy-to-follow screens, gather input, and show results all within a click-based interface.
  • Integration with Standard Salesforce Features:
    When your automation involves Salesforce data and standard objects, and there’s no need for external system integration or heavy customization, Flows are efficient and easy to configure.

When to Use Apex

While Salesforce Flows handle many use cases, Apex is the better choice in more complex scenarios. Consider using Apex in the following cases:

  • Advanced Business Logic:
    If the process requires complex decision-making, nested loops, calculations, or custom logic, Apex gives you more control over how data is processed. For example, if you need to calculate a value based on multiple record types or external data sources, Apex will handle it better than Flow.
  • Bulk Data Processing:
    When dealing with large volumes of records (e.g., millions of records), Apex is more optimized for bulk operations, as you can manage transactions more efficiently and handle large data sets with techniques like batch processing.
  • External System Integrations:
    When you need to integrate with third-party services or external systems, Apex’s ability to invoke web services and make HTTP callouts provides greater flexibility and scalability. Flows, on the other hand, are limited to the out-of-the-box connectors provided by Salesforce.
  • Custom UI or Visualforce Pages:
    If your business process requires custom user interfaces or advanced custom components, Apex, in combination with Visualforce or Lightning Web Components (LWC), provides full control over the front-end experience.
  • Performance Optimization:
    Apex allows you to write optimized code, fine-tuning performance to handle complex logic more efficiently. For scenarios where performance and speed are critical, Apex provides tools for optimization that Flows cannot match.

Conclusion: Flows vs. Apex

Both Salesforce Flows and Apex are powerful tools that serve different purposes in Salesforce automation. Flows shine in simplicity, user-driven processes, and quick deployments, while Apex is the better option for advanced logic, bulk data operations, and complex integrations.

As a rule of thumb:

  • Use Salesforce Flows when you need a low-code, declarative solution that’s easy to maintain and deploy, especially for less technical users.
  • Use Apex when your solution requires complex logic, external integrations, or performance optimization.

Ultimately, the decision to use Flow or Apex comes down to the complexity of the business logic and the level of customization required for the task at hand. By understanding the strengths and complexities of each, you can make the best choice for your organization’s needs.

We would love to hear your comments!

Trending